<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Criminal Justice and Criminology Faculty Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Georgia State University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cj_facpub</link>
<description>Recent documents in Criminal Justice and Criminology Faculty Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:00:19 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Homeland Security and Community Policing: Competing or Complementing Public Safety Policies</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cj_facpub/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cj_facpub/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:25:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist atrocities in the United States, a new organizational policy was introduced as “Homeland Security.” Both a concept and a governmental department, homeland security became the “in” policy, and as such invented a new organization and a new approach to public safety. As a result, however, the dominant policing policy up to that time — Community Policing — was largely sidestepped by homeland security efforts as well as budgets. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that the two public safety policies actually have a great deal in common, and that homeland security is to benefit from integrating principles of community policing in its localized strategies.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert R. Friedmann et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
