<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Buck v Bell Documents</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012 Georgia State University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub</link>
<description>Recent documents in Buck v Bell Documents</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:36:54 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Buck v. Bell: Reply Brief for Appellant</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/98</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/98</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:57:37 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Reply brief for appellant before the Virginia Supreme Court.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Eugenics Bibliography</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/96</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/96</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:57:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Bibliography of works relating to eugenics and the eugenics movement.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul A. Lombardo</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Whitehead: Supreme Court Brief</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/97</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/97</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:57:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>&quot; . . . Three Generations of Imbeciles are Enough . . .&quot;: State Eugenic Sterilization in American Thought and Practice</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/95</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/95</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:57:35 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Julius Paul</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Buck v. Bell: Supreme Court Opinion</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/94</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/94</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:11 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Buck v. Bell.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Buck v. Bell: Brief for Appellee</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/93</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/93</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:11 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Brief for appellee before the Virginia Supreme Court in Buck v. Bell.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Buck v. Bell Historic Marker Unveiling Ceremony - Program</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/92</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/92</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Program for a ceremony unveiling a historic marker near Carrie Buck's grave describing Buck v. Bell.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Buck v. Bell: Petition for Rehearing</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/91</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/91</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Petition for rehearing and argument before the Supreme Court of the United States submitted on behalf of Carrie Buck by her attorneys.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Vivian Buck Gradebook</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/89</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/89</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Gradebook showing grades for Vivian Buck, Carrie Buck's daughter.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Carrie Buck Commitment Papers</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/90</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/90</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Papers committing Carrie Buck to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>House Joint Resolution No. 299: Honoring the Memory of Carrie Buck</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/88</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/88</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:08 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Resolution offered before the Virginia House of Representatives in 2002 honoring the memory of Carrie Buck.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Jacobson v. Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/87</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/87</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:08 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Jacobson v. Massachusetts</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Poe v. Lynchburg Settlement Order</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/85</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/85</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:07 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Order and settlement agreement settling Poe v. Lynchburg.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Letter from George Mallory to Albert Priddy</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/86</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/86</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:07 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Senate Joint Resolution No. 79 Commending Raymond W. Hudlow</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/84</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/84</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:06 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Resolution offered before the Virginia State Senate commending Raymond Hudlow for his military service during World War II.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Skinner v. Oklahoma</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/83</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/83</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:06 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Skinner v. Oklahoma.</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>Statement of Governor Mark R. Warner on the 75th Anniversary of the Buck v. Bell Decision</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/82</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/82</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:25:05 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Statement of Virginia Governor Mark Warner on the 75th anniversary of the decision in Buck v. Bell apologizing for Virginia's participation in eugenics.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mark R. Warner</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Surgical Treatment of Habitual Criminals</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/81</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/81</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:35:14 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In 1899, Dr. Albert Ochsner suggested a different operation to achieve infertility. In a discussion focused on treatments for prostrate problems, Ochsner described how he surgically removed a portion of the cord technically known as the vas deferens, thereby permanently removing a route for the sperm to travel. Ochsner's surgery may have been the first reported vasectomy, but he specifically prescribed it as a means of preventing the procreation of convicted criminals. Since castration ignited "the strongest possible opposition," he recommended that vasectomy be considered not only for criminals but also for "chronic inebriates, imbeciles, perverts, and paupers."</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>A.J. Ochsner</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Willie Mallory Complaint</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/80</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/80</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:35:13 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Dr. Priddy contacted Sarah Roller just after he engineered the 1916 change in Virginia law that authorized him to provide expanded “moral, medical, and surgical treatment” to Colony patients. He noted that of the 185 patients admitted to the Colony during the previous year, fifty-seven had come from the city of Richmond. Priddy gloated at his success in helping Roller “clear up the rubbish” in Virginia’s capital. Bragging aside, the main purpose of Priddy’s letter was to alert Roller that he was ready to relieve her of the “burden of the Mallory crowd.”</p>

	]]>
</description>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Legal Status of Eugenical Sterilization</title>
<link>http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/79</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/79</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:35:12 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Laughlin crafted a special pedigree chart showing evidence presented at the Buck trial describing the "Most immediate Blood Kin of Carrie Buck, Showing illegitimacy and hereditary feeblemindedness." Laughlin declared that following Buck, the operation of eugenical sterilization would no longer be considered "a wild or radical proposition" but would be seen by most Americans as "a reasonable and conservative matter." Laughlin emphasized that the endorsement of state authority to perform compulsory operations without regard for the consent of the patient or his family was an "outstanding feature" of the Buck decision. It constituted an application of the scientific method to statecraft, and employed the "modern sciences" of law and eugenics.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Harry H. Laughlin</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
